Chang

Chang v. County of Siskiyou

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20252:22-cv-01378California3,025 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | Ger Chong Ze Chang, et al., No. 2:22-cev-01378-KJM-AC 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 v. County of Siskiyou, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 For the reasons below, plaintiffs’ motion to modify the preliminary injunction is denied, 18 | and the parties are ordered to show cause why the preliminary injunction should not be limited 19 | to plaintiffs Russell Mathis and Mai Nou Vang only, as specified at the conclusion of this order. 20 | I. BACKGROUND 21 In previous orders, this court (1) granted plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a supplemental 22 | complaint, which alleges recent zoning enforcement efforts by Siskiyou County officials have 23 | deprived residents of water for their basic needs, see Order (Oct. 25, 2024) at 13-15, ECF 24 | No. 100; (2) denied plaintiffs’ motion to certify a class on a provisional basis without prejudice to 25 | renewal, see id. at 15—19; (3) granted plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.