Chang

Chang v. County of Siskiyou

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20252:22-cv-01378California3,025 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Ger Chong Ze Chang, et al., No. 2:22-cev-01378-KJM-AC Plaintiffs, ORDER v. County of Siskiyou, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 For the reasons below, plaintiffs’ motion to modify the preliminary injunction is denied, 18 and the parties are ordered to show cause why the preliminary injunction should not be limited 19 to plaintiffs Russell Mathis and Mai Nou Vang only, as specified at the conclusion of this order. 20 I. BACKGROUND In previous orders, this court (1) granted plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a supplemental complaint, which alleges recent zoning enforcement efforts by Siskiyou County officials have 23 deprived residents of water for their basic needs, see Order (Oct. 25, 2024) at 13-15, ECF No. 100; (2) denied plaintiffs’ motion to certify a class on a provisional basis without prejudice to 25 renewal, see id. at 15—19; (3) granted plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.