(PC) McCoy v. Sac County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20252:22-cv-01769California1,986 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEROME ELI MCCOY, No. 2:22-cv-1769 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND SAC COUNTY JAIL, et al. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Jerome Eli McCoy, a county inmate, proceeds without counsel and seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s third amended complaint (“TAC”) is before the court for screening. The TAC states a deliberate indifference claim against defendants Darwin and Jarvis in connection with the denial of plaintiff’s medication for 30 days. No other claims are stated. By separate order, the court will order service on the defendants. By these findings and recommendations, the undersigned recommends all other claims be dismissed without further leave to amend. The court also denies without prejudice plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel and denies as unnecessary plaintiff’s motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.