(PC) McCoy v. Sac County Jail
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEROME ELI MCCOY, No. 2:22-cv-1769 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 SAC COUNTY JAIL, et al. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Jerome Eli McCoy, a county inmate, proceeds without counsel and seeks relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302. See 28 19 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s third amended complaint (“TAC”) is before the court for 20 screening. The TAC states a deliberate indifference claim against defendants Darwin and Jarvis in 21 connection with the denial of plaintiff’s medication for 30 days. No other claims are stated. 22 By separate order, the court will order service on the defendants. By these findings and 23 recommendations, the undersigned recommends all other claims be dismissed without further 24 leave to amend. The court also denies without prejudice plaintiff’s motion for appointment of 25 counsel and denies as unnecessary plaintiff’s motion for…