(PS) Singh v. City of Placerville

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20252:24-cv-02454California1,053 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAJ SINGH, Case No. 2:24-cv-2454-DAD-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CITY OF PLACERVILLE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff brings this action against defendants City of Placerville, Samuel Emerson, and Mark Adams. I recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim. I will grant plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, which makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Id. 27 28 A complaint must…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.