(PS) Serris v. Solano County

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILL JOSEPH SERRIS, No. 2:24-cv-02251-DAD-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER SOLANO COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and screened his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). ECF No. 3. The Court gave Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on December 4, 2024. The Court has reviewed the FAC and finds it is legally deficient but will grant Plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint. I. SCREENING A. Legal Standard The federal IFP statute requires federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seeks monetary relief from a…