Ying

Ying v. McHenry

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 29, 202523-423California631 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 29 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LINA YING; et al., No. 23-423 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A206-546-795

A206-546-796

v.

A206-546-797

JAMES R. MCHENRY III, Acting Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 22, 2025**

Before: CLIFTON, CALLAHAN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Lina Ying, Zhiping Huang, and Ying’s child, natives and citizens of China,

petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their

applications for asylum and Ying’s applications for withholding of removal and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). protection under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.