Antonio Hinojos v. Kohl's Corporation

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 8, 201311-55793California182 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTONIO S. HINOJOS, individually No. 11-55793 and on behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 2:10-cv-07590-

ODW-AGR

v.

KOHL’S CORPORATION , a Wisconsin ORDER corporation; KOHL’S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

Filed July 8, 2013

Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Kim McLane Wardlaw, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The majority opinion filed May 21, 2013, is hereby amended as follows:

1. Footnote 6, Slip. Op. at 11, is deleted. 2 HINOJOS V . KOHL’S CORP .

With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are denied.

The petition for rehearing and the suggestion for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No future petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.