Standage

Standage v. Bruno CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 2025A165207California3,956 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/29/25 Standage v. Bruno CA1/5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

SCOTT STANDAGE,

Plaintiff and Appellant, A165207 v. DIETER BRUNO, (San Mateo County Defendant and Respondent. Super. Ct. No. 19-CIV-01798)

This is an appeal from a trial court order requiring an unsuccessful medical malpractice plaintiff, Scott Standage, to pay expert witness costs incurred by defendant Dieter Bruno. Approximately seven months after plaintiff filed the complaint, defendant made an offer to settle in exchange for dismissal and a waiver of costs and malicious prosecution rights pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 998.1 Plaintiff let the offer expire without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.