Ferro

Ferro v. Merritt CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 2025B330902California9,347 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/29/25 Ferro v. Merritt CA2/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

CARL FERRO, B330902

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No.20STCV36194) v.

WILLIAM MERRITT,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Gail Killefer and Richard J. Burdge, Jr., Judges. Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded. Pamela A. Mozer for Defendant and Appellant. Friedman, Enriquez & Carlson, Grant A. Carlson for Plaintiff and Respondent. Plaintiff Carl Ferro (buyer) sued defendant William Merritt (seller) for breach of contract arising out of a purchase agreement (the PSA) for the sale of residential property. Buyer alleged that under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.