Phan

Phan v. County of Orange

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 29, 202523-2948California362 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 29 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TIN PHAN, No. 23-2948 D.C. No. 8:23-cv-00374-JWH-KES Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF ORANGE; SOCIAL

SERVICE AGENCY FOR CHILDREN

AND FAMILY,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John W. Holcomb, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 22, 2025**

Before: CLIFTON, CALLAHAN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Tin Phan appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his action

seeking to confirm an arbitration award regarding the custody of his minor child.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. Noel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.