Mora

Mora v. Montgomery

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20253:22-cv-01431California10,270 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VICTOR MORA, Case No.: 22cv1431-RSH(LR)

Plaintiff,

REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION FOR ORDER

GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

TOR ROBINSON, et al.,

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

Defendants. JUDGMENT

16 [ECF NO. 39] 17 18 19 This Report and Recommendation is submitted to United States District Judge Robert S. Huie pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Civil Local Rule 72.3(f) of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. For the reasons discussed below, the Court RECOMMENDS GRANTING Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. / / / / / / / / / / / / I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural History On September 19, 2022, Plaintiff Victor Mora, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Defendants Warden L. Montgomery, Dr. Tor Robinson, Dr. Nathan Williams, registered nurse (“R.N.”) Bianca Ramirez,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.