Mora

Mora v. Montgomery

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20253:22-cv-01431California10,270 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VICTOR MORA, Case No.: 22cv1431-RSH(LR)

12 Plaintiff,

REPORT AND

13 v. RECOMMENDATION FOR ORDER

GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

14 TOR ROBINSON, et al.,

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

15 Defendants. JUDGMENT

16 [ECF NO. 39] 17 18 19 20 This Report and Recommendation is submitted to United States District Judge 21 Robert S. Huie pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Civil Local Rule 72.3(f) of the United 22 States District Court for the Southern District of California. For the reasons discussed 23 below, the Court RECOMMENDS GRANTING Defendants’ Motion for Summary 24 Judgment. 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 I. BACKGROUND 2 A. Procedural History 3 On September 19, 2022, Plaintiff Victor Mora, proceeding pro se, filed a civil 4 rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Defendants Warden L. 5 Montgomery, Dr. Tor Robinson, Dr. Nathan Williams, registered nurse (“R.N.”) Bianca 6 Ramirez,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.