Dalavai

Dalavai v. University of California San Diego Health

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20253:22-cv-01471California4,941 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RANDAL JEROME DALAVAI, Case No.: 3:22-cv-01471-CAB-DDL Plaintiff, 12

ORDER PARTIALLY DISMISSING

v. 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PREJUDICE

14 CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants. ORDER DISMISSING MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

16

WITH PREJUDICE

17 18 [ECF Nos. 41, 49] 19 20 After an appeal to the Ninth Circuit, Plaintiff has filed a an amended complaint, 21 [ECF No. 41], against Defendants University Health Services of Rancho Springs (d/b/a as 22 Inland Valley Medical Center), the Regents of the University of California (Regents), Drs. 23 Laurence Boggelin and Daniel Calac, Ms. Donna Loza, and Mr. Deo Besana.1 The 24 complaint again alleges EMTALA violations, state law claims, and claims under 42 U.S.C. 25 § 1983 for violations of the Due Process Clause and the Supremacy Clause. [ECF No. 41.] 26

27 1 As the attorneys for Dr. Boggelin point out, Plaintiff misspelled his name as “Dr.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.