Cammack
Golden Eagle Insurance Corporation v. Cammack
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE Case No. 24-cv-01670-AMO CORPORATION, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 STAY & TERMINATING MOTION v. FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 10 PLEADINGS RICHARD CAMMACK, et al., 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 24, 32 Defendants.
12
13 14 In this action, Plaintiffs Golden Eagle Insurance Corporation and Peerless Insurance 15 Company seek a declaratory judgment that they have no coverage obligation, duty to defend, or 16 duty to indemnify Defendant Richard Cammack, doing business as Contra Costa Ballet Centre, in 17 ongoing state court litigation. Plaintiffs also seek reimbursement for costs incurred in defending 18 Cammack in the state court action. Those proceedings arise from allegations that a ballet 19 instructor – Viktor Kabaniaev – sexually abused Jane WK Doe1 while she was a minor. Cammack 20 moves to stay this action pending resolution of the state court litigation. Plaintiffs…