Cammack

Golden Eagle Insurance Corporation v. Cammack

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20253:24-cv-01670California1,003 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE Case No. 24-cv-01670-AMO CORPORATION, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY & TERMINATING MOTION v. FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS RICHARD CAMMACK, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 24, 32 Defendants.

13 In this action, Plaintiffs Golden Eagle Insurance Corporation and Peerless Insurance Company seek a declaratory judgment that they have no coverage obligation, duty to defend, or duty to indemnify Defendant Richard Cammack, doing business as Contra Costa Ballet Centre, in ongoing state court litigation. Plaintiffs also seek reimbursement for costs incurred in defending Cammack in the state court action. Those proceedings arise from allegations that a ballet instructor – Viktor Kabaniaev – sexually abused Jane WK Doe1 while she was a minor. Cammack moves to stay this action pending resolution of the state court litigation. Plaintiffs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.