Hosey

(PC) Beavers v. Hosey

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20251:21-cv-00650California7,424 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARY LEE BEAVERS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00650-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

EXHAUSTION BASED MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO

DEFENDANTS MENDOZA AND

HOSEY, MENDOZA, and ESPINOZA, ESPINOZA1 Defendants. (Doc. No. 38) 16 17 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ exhaustion-based Motion for Summary Judgment brought on behalf of Defendants Mendoza, and Espinoza on October 25, 2024. (Doc. No. 38, “MSJ”). Plaintiff filed an Opposition, (Doc. No. 41), and Defendants filed a Reply. (Doc. No. 44). Finding no genuine dispute of material fact that Plaintiff did not exhaust his Eighth Amendment failure to protect claims against Defendants Mendoza and Espinoza, the Court grants Defendants’ MSJ. This case remains pending against only Defendant Hosey. I. BACKGROUND A. Summary of Plaintiff’s Operative Complaint Plaintiff Gary Lee Beavers (“Plaintiff” or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.