Narang

Narang v. Narang

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20253:24-cv-09007California754 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KAMAL NARANG, Case No. 24-cv-09007-RFL

Plaintiff,

SCREENING ORDER

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 1, 12 AMARJIT NARANG, et al., Defendants.

Plaintiff Kamal Narang, who is representing herself, brings claims against seventeen individuals: Amarjit Narang, John Stanley, Bhupinder Bhandari, Mary Elizabeth Grant, Pareek Gautam, Alison S. Flowers, Swapna Anthoor, Dr. Pardeep Kumar, Kathy Sweatt, Antionique Avista, Chad Finke, Somnath Raj Chatterjee, Thomas Nixon, S. Pulido, C. Smiley, S. Sato, and S. Spain. Although the Complaint is difficult to understand in places, it appears to allege that a family court matter filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda in 2019 has turned into fraud and that each of the above-named Defendants were involved in that fraud. (Dkt. No. 1.) The Complaint is comprised of a civil case cover sheet dated December 12, 2024 and approximate 130 pages of hand written and typed notes and medical records. (Id.) Kamal Narang also seeks to expedite her case. (Dkt. No. 12.) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the Court has reviewed the Complaint and concludes that it must be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.