Perez

Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20253:24-cv-00100California4,526 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 TERESA P., Case No.: 24-cv-100-AJB-DDL 13 Plaintiff,

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

14 v. FOR ORDER REMANDING

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL COMMISSIONER’S DECISION

15

SECURITY,

16 Defendant. 17 18 The undersigned respectfully submits this Report and Recommendation to 19 United States District Judge Anthony J. Battaglia pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) 20 and Civil Local Rule 72.1.c. Plaintiff Teresa P. seeks judicial review of the Social 21 Security Commissioner’s denial of her application for disability benefits pursuant 22 to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and requests remand to the Social Security Administration for 23 further proceedings, “including a de novo hearing and a new decision.” Dkt. No. 1. 24 For the reasons stated below, the Court finds the Commissioner’s determination 25 that Plaintiff is not disabled is not supported by substantial evidence, and 26 therefore RECOMMENDS the District Court REMAND the Commissioner’s 27 decision to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.