Clare Jacobs v. Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLARE JACOBS, Case No. 2:24-cv-10724-FMO (MAR) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR
13
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A
v.
COURT ORDER
14
SONY PICTURES
15 ENTERTAINMENT, INC., et al., 16 Defendant. 17 18 On December 12, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Complaint and a Request to Proceed 19 in Forma Pauperis (“IFP request”). (ECF Nos. 1, 3.) In the Complaint, Plaintiff 20 alleged several forms of employment discrimination. (ECF No. 1.) 21 On December 18, 2024, the Court postponed a ruling on Plaintiff’s IFP 22 request for 30 days. (ECF No. 7.) Specifically, Plaintiff was ordered to file an 23 Amended Complaint curing the pleading deficiencies of her original Complaint, 24 which was too conclusory to state a claim on which relief may be granted. (Id.) 25 The Order warned Plaintiff that her failure to comply within thirty days would 26 result in dismissal of the action. (Id.) 27 As of this date, more than thirty days later, Plaintiff has not…