Omar Luna v. E-1 Investments, LLC
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 Case No.: 2:24-cv-10762-MEMF-PVC 11 OMAR LUNA,
12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE
COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO
13 v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL
JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S
14 STATE LAW CLAIMS E1 INVESTMENTS, LLC; and DOES 1 to 10, 15 Defendants. 16
17
18
19
20 On December 13, 2024, Plaintiff Omar Luna (“Luna”) filed a Complaint against Defendants
21 E1 Investments, LLC; and Does 1 to 10 (“Defendants”), asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief 22 arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 23 12010–12213; (2) a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh 24 Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–52, et seq.; (3) a claim for damages pursuant to the California Disabled 25 Persons Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 54, et seq.; (4) a claim for damages and injunctive relief pursuant to 26 the Cal. Health & Safety Code § 19955, et seq.; and (5) a claim for negligence.…