Novoselac
Novoselac v. ISM Vuzem d.o.o.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 STJEPAN NOVOSELAC, et al., Case No. 21-cv-08654-BLF
9 Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SET
10 v. ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT
11 ISM VUZEM D.O.O., et al., [Re: ECF 77] 12 Defendants.
13 14 Before the Court is a pro se motion brought by Defendants Robert Vuzem and Ivan Vuzem 15 (“Movants”) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6), seeking to set aside the default 16 judgment entered against them and their companies, Defendants ISM Vuzem d.o.o. and HRID- 17 Mont d.o.o. See Defs.’ Mot. to Set Aside Default J., ECF 77. The motion is opposed by 18 Plaintiffs. See Pls.’ Opp., ECF 78. No reply has been filed. The Court previously issued an order 19 submitting the motion for decision without oral argument. See Order Submitting Mot., ECF 80. 20 The motion to set aside the default judgment is DENIED for the reasons discussed below. 21 I. BACKGROUND 22 Plaintiffs filed this suit in the Alameda County…