Novoselac

Novoselac v. ISM Vuzem d.o.o.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20255:21-cv-08654California3,607 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 STJEPAN NOVOSELAC, et al., Case No. 21-cv-08654-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SET

v. ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT

ISM VUZEM D.O.O., et al., [Re: ECF 77] Defendants.

13 Before the Court is a pro se motion brought by Defendants Robert Vuzem and Ivan Vuzem (“Movants”) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6), seeking to set aside the default judgment entered against them and their companies, Defendants ISM Vuzem d.o.o. and HRID- Mont d.o.o. See Defs.’ Mot. to Set Aside Default J., ECF 77. The motion is opposed by Plaintiffs. See Pls.’ Opp., ECF 78. No reply has been filed. The Court previously issued an order submitting the motion for decision without oral argument. See Order Submitting Mot., ECF 80. The motion to set aside the default judgment is DENIED for the reasons discussed below. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs filed this suit in the Alameda County…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.