Ohio Security Insurance Company v. Stockwoodco, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20251:24-cv-00279California947 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE Case No. 1:24-cv-00279-KES-EPG

COMPANY,

11 Plaintiff, 12 ORDER REQUIRING SUPPLEMENT IN v. SUPPORT OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS 13 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS STOCKWOODCO, INC., et al., STOCKWOODCO, INC. AND NAT STOCK 14 Defendants. (ECF No. 29) 15

16 17 Plaintiff Ohio Security Insurance Company seeks a declaratory judgment that it owes no 18 duty to defend or indemnify Nat Stock (the president and sole owner of Stockwoodco, Inc.) or 19 Stockwoodco, Inc. (collectively, the relevant Defendants for purposes of this order) in a pending state court case. (ECF No. 1, p. 1). Before the assigned District Judge, there is a pending motion 20 for judgment on the pleadings filed by Plaintiff that Defendants have opposed. (ECF Nos. 23, 26). 21 This matter is now before the Court on the motion of Defendants’ attorneys—Jay 22 Christofferson and Nathan Martin to withdraw—to withdraw as counsel, generally because 23 Defendants have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.