David Everett Leibowitz v. Riverside County
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION
18 On March 18, 2024, Plaintiff David Everett Leibowitz (“Plaintiff”), a 19 California pretrial detainee proceeding pro se, initiated this civil rights action 20 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. No. 1. On September 3, 2024, the Court 21 dismissed Plaintiff’s Civil Rights Complaint, the operative complaint, with leave to 22 amend within 30 days. Dkt. No. 10 at 11. The Court cautioned Plaintiff that failure 23 to timely file an amended complaint may result in the dismissal of his lawsuit with 24 or without prejudice based on the grounds set forth in the screening order or for 25 failure to prosecute. Id. at 12. When Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint by 26 the court-ordered deadline, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause on November 27 15, 2024 (“OSC”). Dkt. No. 11. The OSC directed Plaintiff to show cause in writing 28 1 why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Id. To date, Plaintiff 2 has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise been in communication with the 3 Court. 4 For the reasons set forth below, the Court dismisses this action without 5 prejudice for failure to…