Liang

Liang v. Bardini

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20251:24-cv-00769California510 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

9 ZENENG LIANG, Case No. 1:24-cv-00769-KES-SKO

10 Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

11 v. ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

RECOMMENDED FOR DISMISSAL

12 AND VACATING SCHEDULING

EMILIA BARDINI, CONFERENCE

13 Defendant. (Doc. 13) 14 _____________________________________/

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

15 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the complaint in this action on April 23, 2024. (Doc. 1) 17 On October 25, 2024, the Court issued an order directing Plaintiff to file proof of service 18 and/or a status report indicating whether they contend to continue to prosecute this case by no later 19 than January 23, 2025. (Doc. 13.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed proof of service, a status report, 20 or requested an extension of time within which to do so. 21 The Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 22 corresponding with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel 23…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.