Estate of Ruben Guzman v. County of Riverside

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20255:24-cv-01199California7,315 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 ESTATE OF RUBEN GUZMAN, by Case No. 5:24-cv-01199-SSS-DTB 12 and through successor in interest Ruben Guzman, Sr., individually, 13 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] STIPULATED 14 PROTECTIVE ORDER v. 15 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a public 16 entity; RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT;

17 SHERIFF CHAD BIANCO, in his individual and official capacities; 18 EDWARD DELGADO; JAMES

KRACHMER; MARTIN TOCHTROP;

19 and DOES 1 through 10, individually, jointly and severally, 20 Defendants. 21

22

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

23 By and through their counsel of record in this action, plaintiff ESTATE OF RUBEN 24 GUZMAN, by and through successor in interest Ruben Guzman, Sr., individually, 25 (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiffs”) and defendants COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, 26 a public entity; RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; SHERIFF 27 CHAD BIANCO, in his individual and official capacities; EDWARD DELGADO; 1 JAMES KRACHMER; MARTIN TOCHTROP; and DOES 1 through 10, 2 individually, jointly and severally (hereinafter referred to collectively…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.