Harris

Harris v. Galactic Co., LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20251:24-cv-01347California657 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 AMBER S. HARRIS, Case No. 1:24-cv-01347-CDB

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

13 v.

FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE THIS ACTION AND TO

14 GALACTIC CO., LLC,

COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS

15 Defendant.

ORDER CONTINUING THE

MANDATORY SCHEDULING

16

CONFERENCE

17

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

EFFECT SERVICE OF THIS ORDER AND

18

TO FILE PROOF OF SERVICE

19

FIVE-DAY DEADLINE

20 21 Plaintiff Amber S. Harris (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action with the filing of a complaint 22 on November 4, 2024. (Doc. 1). The same day, the Clerk of the Court issued summons for 23 service upon Defendant Galactic Co., LLC, and the Court entered an order setting a mandatory 24 scheduling conference for February 3, 2025. (Docs. 3-4). The Court’s order directed Plaintiff to 25 “diligently pursue service of summons and complaint” and “promptly file proofs of service.” 26 (Doc. 4 at 1). The order further advised Plaintiff that failure to diligently prosecute this action 27 “may result…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.