(PC) Smith v. John Doe 1

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20251:25-cv-00109California576 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

10 FREDERICK WAYNE SMITH, Case No. 1:25-cv-00109-KES-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12

TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

v. 13 PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS JOHN DOE #1, et al., 14 (ECF NO. 2) Defendants. 15 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY,

DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS

16 17 Plaintiff Frederick Smith is a pro se inmate at Kern Valley State Prison, who filed this 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on January 27, 2025. (ECF No. 1). Along with his 19 complaint, Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) pursuant to 28 20 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2). In addition, the Court received a certified Trust Account 21 Statement for Plaintiff’s account from California Department of Corrections. (ECF No. 6). 22 The Court normally requires a $405 filing fee for a civil action. However, a federal 23 statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, permits a plaintiff to commence a lawsuit without prepaying a filing 24 fee. This statute requires “an affidavit that includes a statement of all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.