Whitney

(PS) McMahon v. Whitney

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20252:23-cv-01972California1,396 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN MCMAHON, Case No. 2:23-cv-1972-KJM-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

JOHN WHITNEY, et al.,

Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, initially represented by counsel but now proceeding pro se, brought this case alleging that his personnel records at the Vallejo Police Department were breached and released to a local newspaper. ECF No. 1. Pending are his motions to strike, ECF No. 52, and for sanctions, ECF No. 56. The motion to strike seeks to strike documents that defendant John Whitney’s former counsel filed in an opposition to plaintiff’s motion to disqualify counsel. ECF No. 52; see ECF No. 66. Plaintiff argues that these documents were privileged insofar as they are confidential personnel records and include attorney-client communications between plaintiff and Whitney’s former counsel, Alison Berry Wilkinson, who previously represented plaintiff in a separate matter. The relevant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.