Bonta

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRANDON G. ADAMS, Case No. 2:24-cv-3300-DAD-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ROB BONTA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint alleging claims against defendants 18 California Attorney General Rob Bonta, Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford, and Director of 19 the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Rohit Chopra. The allegations fail to state a claim. 20 Plaintiff may, if he chooses, to file an amended complaint that addresses the deficiencies noted 21 herein. I will grant plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 2. 22 Screening and Pleading Requirements 23 A complaint must contain a short and plain statement that plaintiff is entitled to relief, 24 Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2), and provide “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its 25 face,” Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). The plausibility standard does not 26 require detailed allegations, but legal conclusions do not…