(PC) Martin v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20252:24-cv-03380California565 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AMAYA MARTIN Case No. 2:24-cv-3380-JDP (P) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

15 Defendants. 16 17 Defendants California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, 18 California Institutions for Women, and Officer Davis removed this action from Sacramento 19 Superior Court on the basis of federal question jurisdiction. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff moves to 20 remand, ECF No. 7; defendants do not oppose remand, ECF No. 8. I recommend that the matter 21 be remanded. 22 Plaintiff, a former inmate, filed this action on September 12, 2024, in Sacramento County 23 Superior Court. ECF No. 1 at 7. The complaint brings six state causes of action and one 24 federal—violation of the Eighth Amendment. Id. at 17-29. On December 4, 2024, defendants 25 removed this action on the basis of federal question jurisdiction. Id. at 2. Plaintiff then filed an 26 amended complaint, wherein she deleted her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.