Teradyne, Inc. v. Astronics Test Systems, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 30, 202524-239California706 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 30 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TERADYNE, INC., No. 24-239 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:20-cv-02713-GW-SHK v.
MEMORANDUM*
ASTRONICS TEST SYSTEMS, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted January 16, 2025 San Francisco, California
Before: H.A. THOMAS and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges, and BOLTON, District Judge.**
Teradyne, Inc. appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to
Astronics Test Systems, Inc. after the district court found that Astronics’ copying
of Teradyne’s copyrighted software code (“Asserted Works”) constituted fair use.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Susan R. Bolton, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a…