People v. Archuleta CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
INTRODUCTION
Defendant Raymond Anthony Archuleta appeals from the trial court’s order
denying his request for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.75 after the
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) notified the trial court
that his judgment includes a now-invalid prior prison term enhancement.1 The trial court
struck defendant’s enhancements but declined to recall his sentence and resentence him
under section 1172.75, subdivision (d).
On appeal, defendant argues that section 1172.75’s resentencing procedure applies
to any defendant who is serving prison or jail time on a judgment that includes a now-
invalid prior prison term enhancement, regardless of whether the enhancement was
originally stayed, or its punishment was stricken. We disagree. If the punishment on a
now-invalid prison prior was stricken when the defendant was originally sentenced, then
the defendant is ineligible for resentencing under section 1172.75, subdivision (d). We
affirm.
BACKGROUND2
Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant pled guilty in April 2017 to a criminal
threat (§ 422), and he admitted personal use of a deadly and dangerous weapon (§ 12022,
subd.…