Baker
United States v. Baker
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 30 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-1242
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:22-cr-00102-DLC-1
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MARK SAMUEL BAKER,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Dana L. Christensen, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 3, 2024** Portland, Oregon
Before: CALLAHAN, NGUYEN, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
Appellant Mark Samuel Baker (“Baker”) appeals his jury conviction for
attempted sex trafficking of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591(a) and
1594(a). We presume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and discuss them only
as necessary for context. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirm.
1. Baker first argues there is…