People v. Sanders CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 2025B336316California2,570 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

I. The underlying convictions

In 2004 and 2005, three homes in Long Beach were burglarized. (People v. Sanders (Nov. 21, 2007, B189679) [nonpub. opn.].)2 Sanders lived across the street from one of the burglarized homes, and his thumbprint was found at the burglarized home. In Sanders’s home, law enforcement found

1 All further undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code. 2 The factual background is from the opinion affirming Sanders’s judgment of conviction on direct appeal. We take judicial notice of that opinion on our own motion. (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (a).)

2 property stolen from the homes, including two watches and a coin collection. A jury found Sanders guilty of first degree burglary (§ 459; count 1) and two counts of felony receiving stolen property (§ 496, subd. (a); counts 2 & 3). Sanders then admitted he had two prior convictions within the meaning of the Three Strikes law and a prior prison term within the meaning of section 667.5, subdivision (b). In 2006, the trial court sentenced Sanders, on count 1, to 25 years to life and, on counts 2 and 3, to concurrent terms of 25 years to life. The trial court also imposed two 5-year terms…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.