Roditi
Roditi v. New River Investments Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MANUEL RODITI and VENICE Case No.: 20-cv-01908-RBM-MSB
BEJARANO,
ORDER DENYING
Plaintiffs/Judgment Creditors, DEFENDANT/JUDGMENT DEBTOR v. ALBERTO RODITI’S MOTION
UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL
NEW RIVER INVESTMENTS INC.,
PROCEDURE 60(b)(3) ALBERTO RODITI, and GUILLERMO
RODITI DOMINGUEZ, [ECF No. 249] Defendants/Judgment Debtors. 18 Pending before the Court is Defendant/Judgment Debtor Alberto Roditi’s (“Roditi”)1 “Motion Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 To Amend Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Application for Judgment Debtor Examination of Alberto Roditi or in the Alternative Vacate Order.” [ECF No. 249.] Plaintiffs/Judgment Creditors Manuel Roditi and Venice Bejarano (collectively, “Judgment Creditors”) filed an opposition, to which Roditi replied. [ECF Nos. 251, 252.] The Court found the matter suitable for determination on the papers
26 1 The Court refers to…