Epidemic Sound, AB v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20253:22-cv-04223California1,463 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 EPIDEMIC SOUND, AB, Case No. 22-cv-04223-JSC

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

9 v. FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

10 META PLATFORMS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 202 Defendant. 11

12 13 On October 10, 2024, the Court denied Epidemic Sound, AB’s (“Epidemic”) request to 14 compel Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”) to produce a full export of all data associated with 15 Epidemic’s Rights Manager account. (Dkt. Nos. 170, 177.) Pending before the Court is 16 Epidemic’s motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s October 10, 2024 17 order. Having carefully considered the parties’ submissions, and with the benefit of oral argument 18 on January 28, 2025, the Court DENIES Epidemic’s motion for leave to file a motion for 19 reconsideration. Nevertheless, the Court has inherent authority to modify interlocutory orders and 20 does so here. By February 14, 2025, Meta must produce the on-demand export of Epidemic’s 21 Rights Manager account. 22 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.