Stine
Implicit Conversions, Inc. v. Stine
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 IMPLICIT CONVERSIONS, INC., Case No. 24-cv-03744-WHO
7 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
8 v. DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO
DISMISS AND DENYING MOTIONS
9 JACOB STINE, et al., TO STRIKE 10 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 62, 64
11 12 Defendants and countercomplainants Jacob Stine (“Stine”) and Juanita Traver Stine 13 (“Traver Stine”), who are married, have amended their counterclaims against their former 14 employer, plaintiff and counter defendant Implicit Conversions, Inc. (“Implicit”), and its Chief 15 Executive Officer, Robin Lavallee. Implicit had filed suit against them alleging that they 16 committed computer fraud and violated their contracts. They responded with claims challenging 17 the justifications for their respective terminations and asserting other individual claims against 18 Lavallee. Implicit and Lavallee now move to dismiss three of Stine’s seven counterclaims and all 19 three of Traver Stine’s counterclaims, and ask that I strike…