Marner

Marner v. U.S. Department of the Air Force

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20253:24-cv-01565California570 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 ZACHARY MARNER et al, Case No.: 3:24-cv-01565-JO-BLM 12

Plaintiffs, 13 ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO vs. PROCEED IFP 14

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR

15 FORCE et al, 16 Defendants. 17

18 On September 3, 2024, pro se Plaintiff Zachary Marner,1 filed a complaint against 19 the United States Air Force2 and the United States Space Force. Dkt. 1. Plaintiff alleges 20 that these two Defendants harmed him in various ways, from slandering and sexually 21 assaulting him to murdering his loved ones. Id. Accompanying his complaint, Plaintiff 22 also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), Dkt. 2, and motion to appoint 23 24 25 1 Plaintiff Marner also listed Jeanette Miller, Nevah Marner, Taryn White, Phyllis Sharp, and 26 Tiffany Stroh as additional Plaintiffs in this case. Dkt. 1.

27 2 Plaintiff names the “Department of the U.S. Air Force” as one of the three Defendants in this case. Dkt. 1. For the purposes of this order, the Court construes the Department of the U.S. Air Force…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.