Estrada
Estrada v. County of San Diego
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20253:24-cv-01558California4,066 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOMINICK ESTRADA, Case No.: 24-cv-1558-MMA-LR Booking # 24729020,
ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION
Plaintiff, TO PROCEED IN FORMA vs. PAUPERIS; AND
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, KELLY
[Doc. No. 2] MARTINEZ, Sheriff, CARLSBAD
POLICE DEPARTMENT, SEVERAL (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT
UNKNOWN POLICE OFFICERS,
PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE Defendants. OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 8 AND FOR
FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM
UNDER 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 1915A(b) 20 21 Plaintiff Dominick Estrada (“Plaintiff” or “Estrada”), a detainee proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). See Doc. Nos. 1, 2. In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges his constitutional rights were violated when he was bitten by law enforcement canine. See generally Doc. No. 1. For the reasons…