Estrada
Estrada v. County of San Diego
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DOMINICK ESTRADA, Case No.: 24-cv-1558-MMA-LR Booking # 24729020, 12
ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION
Plaintiff, 13 TO PROCEED IN FORMA vs. PAUPERIS; AND 14
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, KELLY
15 [Doc. No. 2] MARTINEZ, Sheriff, CARLSBAD
16 POLICE DEPARTMENT, SEVERAL (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT
UNKNOWN POLICE OFFICERS,
17 PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE Defendants. OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 8 AND FOR 18
FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM
19 UNDER 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 1915A(b) 20 21 22 Plaintiff Dominick Estrada (“Plaintiff” or “Estrada”), a detainee proceeding pro se, 23 has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with a motion to 24 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). See Doc. Nos. 1, 2. In his Complaint, Plaintiff 25 alleges his constitutional rights were violated when he was bitten by law enforcement 26 canine. See generally Doc. No. 1. For the reasons…