Estrada

Estrada v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20253:24-cv-01558California4,066 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOMINICK ESTRADA, Case No.: 24-cv-1558-MMA-LR Booking # 24729020,

ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION

Plaintiff, TO PROCEED IN FORMA vs. PAUPERIS; AND

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, KELLY

[Doc. No. 2] MARTINEZ, Sheriff, CARLSBAD

POLICE DEPARTMENT, SEVERAL (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT

UNKNOWN POLICE OFFICERS,

PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE Defendants. OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 8 AND FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

UNDER 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 1915A(b) 20 21 Plaintiff Dominick Estrada (“Plaintiff” or “Estrada”), a detainee proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). See Doc. Nos. 1, 2. In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges his constitutional rights were violated when he was bitten by law enforcement canine. See generally Doc. No. 1. For the reasons…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.