Whitfield

Whitfield v. Parmar

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20251:24-cv-00581California4,628 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 STEVEN WHITFIELD, ) Case No.: 1:24-cv-0581 JLT CDB ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING IN PART FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE 13 v. ) CLAIMS UNDER FEDERAL LAW FOR FAILURE ) TO STATE A CLAIM, DISMISSING THE STATE 14 ASHOK PARMAR and BAKERSFIELD ) LAW CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

CENTRAL PAIN MANAGEMENT, ) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND,

15 ) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR A Defendants. ) MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT, AND 16 ) DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE ) THIS CASE 17 ) ) (Doc. 12) 18 )

19 Steven Whitfield asserts he is a former patient of Dr. Ashok Parmar, who owns and provided 20 treatment at Bakersfield Central Pain Management. Plaintiff seeks to the defendants liable for the 21 following: (1) Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, (2) racial discrimination in violation of 22 42 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.