Jaiyeola
Jaiyeola v. Apple, Inc
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 GANIYU AYINLA JAIYEOLA, Case No. 5:23-cv-03462-EJD
9 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING RULE 60(B)
MOTIONS
10 v.
11 APPLE, INC, Re: Dkt. No. 64, 75 Defendant. 12
13 Before the Court are Jaiyeola’s two motions: (1) to vacate the Court’s order granting 14 Defendant’s motion to dismiss and denying Jaiyeola’s motion for leave to file, Mot. to Vacate 15 MTD Order, ECF No. 64; Opp’n, ECF No. 66; Reply, ECF No. 69; and (2) to vacate the Court’s 16 order denying Jaiyeola’s motion to disqualify the Undersigned. Mot. to Vacate Disqualification 17 Order, ECF No. 75; Opp’n, ECF No. 76; Reply, ECF No 77. 18 After carefully considering the relevant documents, the Court finds this matter suitable for 19 decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the 20 Court DENIES Jaiyeola’s motions. 21 I. BACKGROUND 22 The Court previously summarized the procedural history and factual…