Jaiyeola

Jaiyeola v. AT&T

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20255:23-cv-05182California2,080 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 GANIYU AYINLA JAIYEOLA, Case No. 5:23-cv-05182-EJD

9 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING RULE 60(B)

MOTIONS

10 v.

11 T-MOBILE US, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 103, 116 Defendants. 12

13 Before the Court are Jaiyeola’s two motions: (1) to vacate the Court’s order granting 14 Defendant’s motion to dismiss and denying Jaiyeola’s motion for leave to file, Mot. to Vacate 15 MTD Order, ECF No. 103; Opp’n, ECF No. 108; Joinders, ECF Nos. 109, 110, 111; Reply, ECF 16 No. 112; and (2) to vacate the Court’s order denying Jaiyeola’s motion to disqualify the 17 Undersigned. Mot. to Vacate Disqualification Order, ECF No. 116. 18 After carefully considering the relevant documents, the Court finds this matter suitable for 19 decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the 20 Court DENIES Jaiyeola’s motions. 21 I. BACKGROUND 22 The Court previously summarized the procedural history and factual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.