Peterson

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRED FELEKI MARTINEZ, Case No. 2:21-cv-1779-DAD-JDP (P) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 PETERSON, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brought this action alleging that defendant Peterson 18 violated his Eighth Amendment rights by failing to provide him with adequate medical care. 19 Defendant Peterson’s motion for summary judgment is pending. ECF No. 75. Plaintiff has not 20 filed an opposition; instead, he has submitted a motion to compel, ECF No. 90, and a motion to 21 appoint counsel, ECF No. 91. Defendant has filed an opposition to the motion to compel. ECF 22 No. 93. Both motions are denied. Plaintiff must file an opposition to defendant’s motion for 23 summary judgment within fourteen days of this order’s entry. If he fails to do so, I will 24 adjudicate the motion unopposed. 25 Motion to Compel 26 I. Legal Standard 27 Parties are obligated to respond to interrogatories to the fullest extent…