Peterson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRED FELEKI MARTINEZ, Case No. 2:21-cv-1779-DAD-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER PETERSON, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brought this action alleging that defendant Peterson violated his Eighth Amendment rights by failing to provide him with adequate medical care. Defendant Peterson’s motion for summary judgment is pending. ECF No. 75. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition; instead, he has submitted a motion to compel, ECF No. 90, and a motion to appoint counsel, ECF No. 91. Defendant has filed an opposition to the motion to compel. ECF No. 93. Both motions are denied. Plaintiff must file an opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment within fourteen days of this order’s entry. If he fails to do so, I will adjudicate the motion unopposed. Motion to Compel I. Legal Standard Parties are obligated to respond to interrogatories to the fullest extent…