Hales

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRI TOOL, INC., Case No. 2:22-cv-01515-DAD-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SANCTIONS

THAD HALES, et al., (ECF No. 55) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Tri Tool, Inc. moves for sanctions against Defendant Enerpac Tool Group Corp. pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(c).1 Pl. Mot. (ECF No. 55). On January 21, 2025, the Court held an in-person hearing. Attorney Dylan Wiseman appeared for Plaintiff, and attorney James Carter appeared for Defendant Enerpac.2 Having considered the briefing and arguments, and for the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions without prejudice. Plaintiff may elect to file a motion for sanctions against its former manager employees, Defendants Thad Hales and Mike Bracikowski, a motion to compel these individuals, or renew its motion against

This matter proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, and…