Ramos

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 OSCAR RAMOS, Case No. 2:24-cv-01261-CSK 12 Plaintiff, PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AND

ORDER DISMISSING DOE DEFENDANTS

13 v. 14 LESA MARIE GONZALEZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTAINS IMPORTANT DATES THAT 18 THE COURT WILL STRICTLY ENFORCE AND WITH WHICH ALL COUNSEL AND 19 PARTIES, INCLUDING THOSE PROCEEDING WITHOUT COUNSEL, MUST COMPLY. 20 FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE 21 IMPOSITION OF MONETARY AND ALL OTHER APPROPRIATE SANCTIONS. 22 On January 28, 2025, the Court conducted a status (pretrial scheduling) 23 conference in this matter. At the status conference, attorney Richard Mac Bride 24 appeared on behalf of Plaintiff, and attorney David Roth appeared on behalf of 25 Defendants. After considering the parties’ joint status report (ECF No. 18), and the status 26 conference held, the Court issues the following pretrial scheduling order.1 27 1 This matter proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to 28…