Bregante

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 LYNETTE BREGANTE, Case No. 2:24-cv-02873-CSK

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING AMENDED

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

13 v. (ECF No. 14) 14 COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRY MANAGEMENT LLC, et al., 15

Def endants. 16 17 The parties filed a stipulated protective order on January 6, 2025 (ECF No. 12), 18 which the Court declined to approve because it contained references to local rules from 19 other districts. (ECF No. 31). The parties filed the second stipulated protective order 20 below (ECF No. 14), which the Court has reviewed and finds it comports with the 21 relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See L.R. 141.1. The Court APPROVES 22 the amended protective order, subject to the following clarification. 23 The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain 24 jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” 25 L.R. 141.1(f); see Bylin Heating Sys., Inc. v. Thermal Techs., Inc., 2012 WL 13237584, 26 at *2 (E.D.…