Harris

Harris v. Frauenheim

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 31, 202524-642California620 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 31 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GERALD BRENT HARRIS, No. 24-642 D.C. No. Petitioner - Appellant, 1:19-cv-01203-JLT-SAB v.

MEMORANDUM*

SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Jennifer L. Thurston, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 16, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: H.A. THOMAS and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges, and BOLTON, District Judge.** Dissent by Judge BOLTON.

Gerald Brent Harris appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253.

Our review of Harris’ petition is governed by the Antiterrorism and Effective

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Susan R. Bolton, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”). See 28 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.