Zaragoza
Zaragoza v. Adam CA1/3
Opinion
Opinion
Fujisaki, J.
Filed 1/31/25 Zaragoza v. Adam CA1/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
SABRINA ZARAGOZA,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
A168100
v. NADIR ADAM, M.D., (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. CGC21591784) Defendant and Respondent.
Plaintiff Sabrina Zaragoza appeals from the summary judgment entered in favor of defendant Dr. Nadir Adam in this action for medical malpractice. Plaintiff contends Dr. Adam was not entitled to summary judgment because his medical expert failed to provide a reasoned explanation for his opinions that Dr. Adam did not negligently perform gallbladder removal surgery on plaintiff or cause her injuries. We agree and reverse the summary judgment.