Zaragoza

Zaragoza v. Adam CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 2025A168100California3,616 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fujisaki, J.

Filed 1/31/25 Zaragoza v. Adam CA1/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

SABRINA ZARAGOZA,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A168100

v. NADIR ADAM, M.D., (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. CGC21591784) Defendant and Respondent.

Plaintiff Sabrina Zaragoza appeals from the summary judgment entered in favor of defendant Dr. Nadir Adam in this action for medical malpractice. Plaintiff contends Dr. Adam was not entitled to summary judgment because his medical expert failed to provide a reasoned explanation for his opinions that Dr. Adam did not negligently perform gallbladder removal surgery on plaintiff or cause her injuries. We agree and reverse the summary judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff was admitted to Mercy Medical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.