R.H.
R.H. v. Coastal Grove Charter School
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 Daniel R. Shaw (SB No. 281387) daniel@snydershaw.com 2 Julia H. Baker (SB No. 340457) julia@snydershaw.com 3 Snyder & Shaw LLP 4 3196 S. Higuera Street, Suite E San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 5 Telephone: (805) 439-4646 Facsimile: (805) 301-8030 6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12 R.H., a minor, by and through his guardian ad CASE NO.: TBD 1:25-cv-00826-RMI litem Chris Hatton, 13 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER APPOINTING 14 GUARDIAN AD LITEM v. 15 Coastal Grove Charter School, 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 On January 10, 2025, Chris Hatton, as proposed guardian ad litem of R.H., a minor child, 20 and Defendant Coastal Grove Charter School (“the Charter”), filed a Joint Petition for Approval 21 of Minor’s Compromise. The same day, Plaintiff R.H. filed a motion to appoint his mother, Tera 22 Palmer, as guardian ad litem. 23 “To maintain a suit in a federal court, a child or mental incompetent must be represented 24 by a competent adult.” Doe ex rel. Sisco v. Weed Union Elementary School Dist., 2:13-cv- 25 …