James Blaylock v. Orange County Probation Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20252:23-cv-05221California955 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 JAMES BLAYLOCK, Case No. 2:23-05221 MRA (ADS)

Petitioner,

v. ORDER ACCEPTING UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND

ORANGE COUNTY PROBATION DEPT., RECOMMENDATION

Respondent.

16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Dkt. No. 1), Respondent’s Answer (Dkt. No. 11), Petitioner’s Reply (Dkt. No. 19), the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 22), Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 25), and all the records and files herein. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections were made. 23 24 The Report recommends denial of the Petition and dismissal of this action with prejudice. (Dkt. No. 22.) Petitioner’s objections to the Report (Dkt. No. 25) do not warrant a change to the Report’s findings or recommendations. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.