James Blaylock v. Orange County Probation Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20252:23-cv-05221California955 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5

6 7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 JAMES BLAYLOCK, Case No. 2:23-05221 MRA (ADS)

12 Petitioner,

13 v. ORDER ACCEPTING UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND

14 ORANGE COUNTY PROBATION DEPT., RECOMMENDATION

15 Respondent.

16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of 18 Habeas Corpus (Dkt. No. 1), Respondent’s Answer (Dkt. No. 11), Petitioner’s Reply (Dkt. 19 No. 19), the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 20 No. 22), Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 25), and 21 all the records and files herein. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those 22 portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections were made. 23 24 1 The Report recommends denial of the Petition and dismissal of this action with 2 prejudice. (Dkt. No. 22.) Petitioner’s objections to the Report (Dkt. No. 25) do not 3 warrant a change to the Report’s findings or recommendations. 4 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.