Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Last Brand, Inc.

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DECKERS OUTDOOR CORPORATION, Case No. 23-cv-04850-AMO (LJC)

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING JOINT

9 v. DISCOVERY LETTER ADDRESSING

DISCOVERY CUTOFF DISPUTES

10 LAST BRAND, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 114 Defendant. 11

12 I. INTRODUCTION 13 The Court previously denied an application by Plaintiff Deckers Outdoor Corporation 14 (Deckers) for a protective order to prevent Defendant Last Brand, Inc. (Quince) from obtaining 15 discovery from Google through a subpoena served after the close of fact discovery, without 16 prejudice to the parties filing a joint letter in compliance with this Court’s Standing Order. ECF 17 No. 113. The parties have now filed that joint letter, which also addresses a dispute regarding 18 documents first disclosed by Deckers after the close of fact discovery. ECF No. 114. The Court 19 addresses those issues as follows. 20 II. QUINCE’S SUBPOENA 21 Quince served a subpoena on Google LLC on January 23, 2025 requiring production of 22 two YouTube videos and…