Goldup

Goldup v. Valley View Casino and Hotel

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20253:24-cv-00786California1,719 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GARRETT MICHAEL GOLDUP, Case No.: 24-CV-786 JLS (AHG)

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER:

13 v. (1) SUA SPONTE STRIKING 14 VALLEY VIEW CASINO & HOTEL;

PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO

JOHN DOE NO. 1; JOHN DOE NO. 2;

15 DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN and BOYD LONG,

SUPPORT OF MOTION TO

16 Defendants. DISMISS AND REQUEST FOR 17 DISCOVERY, AND

18 (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 19 MOTION REQUESTING ORAL

ARGUMENTS

20

21 (ECF Nos. 24, 25)

22 23 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Garrett Michael Goldup’s Motion Requesting 24 Oral Arguments (“Mot.,” ECF No. 25). Plaintiff’s Motion pertains to Defendants Valley 25 View Casino & Hotel and Boyd Long’s Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint 26 (“MTD,” ECF No. 18). On October 2, 2024, the Court vacated the originally scheduled 27 October 9, 2024 hearing on the Motion to Dismiss and took the Motion to Dismiss under 28 submission. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.