Heather Knight v. Patagonia, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20252:24-cv-09349California1,741 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1

JS-

3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HEATHER KNIGHT, Case No. 2:24-cv-09349-MCS-AGR individually and on behalf of all others 12 similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND (ECF NO. 10) AND

DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

14 Plaintiff, (ECF NO. 12) 15 v.

PATAGONIA, INC.,

Defendant.

22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Heather Knight moves to remand the case. (Mot., ECF No. 10.) Defendant Patagonia, Inc., opposed the motion, (Opp’n, ECF No. 11), and Plaintiff replied, (Reply, ECF No. 13.) The Court heard the motion on December 16, 2024. (Mins., ECF No. 17.) For the following reasons, the Court grants the motion. 5 I. BACKGROUND This is a putative class action for violation of Arizona’s Telephone, Utility and Communication Service Records Act (“Arizona Records Act”). (See generally Compl., ECF No. 1-1.) Plaintiff seeks to represent a class of individuals who opened a marketing email from Defendant that contained a tracking…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.